Search for: All records

A constraint satisfaction problem (CSP),\(\textsf {Max-CSP}(\mathcal {F})\), is specified by a finite set of constraints\(\mathcal {F}\subseteq \lbrace [q]^k \rightarrow \lbrace 0,1\rbrace \rbrace\)for positive integersqandk. An instance of the problem onnvariables is given bymapplications of constraints from\(\mathcal {F}\)to subsequences of thenvariables, and the goal is to find an assignment to the variables that satisfies the maximum number of constraints. In the (γ ,β)-approximation version of the problem for parameters 0 ≤ β ≤ γ ≤ 1, the goal is to distinguish instances where at least γ fraction of the constraints can be satisfied from instances where at most β fraction of the constraints can be satisfied. In this work, we consider the approximability of this problem in the context of sketching algorithms and give a dichotomy result. Specifically, for every family\(\mathcal {F}\)and every β < γ, we show that either a linear sketching algorithm solves the problem in polylogarithmic space or the problem is not solvable by any sketching algorithm in\(o(\sqrt {n})\)space. In particular, we give non-trivial approximation algorithms using polylogarithmic space for infinitely many constraint satisfaction problems. We also extend previously known lower bounds for general streaming algorithms to a wide variety of problems, and in particular the case ofq=k=2, where we get a dichotomy, and the case when the satisfying assignments of the constraints of\(\mathcal {F}\)support a distribution on\([q]^k\)with uniform marginals. Prior to this work, other than sporadic examples, the only systematic classes of CSPs that were analyzed considered the setting of Boolean variablesq= 2, binary constraintsk=2, and singleton families\(|\mathcal {F}|=1\)and only considered the setting where constraints are placed on literals rather than variables. Our positive results show wide applicability of bias-based algorithms used previously by [47] and [41], which we extend to include richer norm estimation algorithms, by giving a systematic way to discover biases. Our negative results combine the Fourier analytic methods of [56], which we extend to a wider class of CSPs, with a rich collection of reductions among communication complexity problems that lie at the heart of the negative results. In particular, previous works used Fourier analysis over the Boolean cube to initiate their results and the results seemed particularly tailored to functions on Boolean literals (i.e., with negations). Our techniques surprisingly allow us to get to generalq-ary CSPs without negations by appealing to the same Fourier analytic starting point over Boolean hypercubes. 

We analyze the sketching approximability of constraint satisfaction problems on Boolean domains, where the constraints are balanced linear threshold functions applied to literals. In particular, we explore the approximability of monarchy-like functions where the value of the function is determined by a weighted combination of the vote of the first variable (the president) and the sum of the votes of all remaining variables. The pure version of this function is when the president can only be overruled by when all remaining variables agree. For every k ≥ 5, we show that CSPs where the underlying predicate is a pure monarchy function on k variables have no non-trivial sketching approximation algorithm in o(√n) space. We also show infinitely many weaker monarchy functions for which CSPs using such constraints are non-trivially approximable by O(log(n)) space sketching algorithms. Moreover, we give the first example of sketching approximable asymmetric Boolean CSPs. Our results work within the framework of Chou, Golovnev, Sudan, and Velusamy (FOCS 2021) that characterizes the sketching approximability of all CSPs. Their framework can be applied naturally to get a computer-aided analysis of the approximability of any specific constraint satisfaction problem. The novelty of our work is in using their work to get an analysis that applies to infinitely many problems simultaneously. 

We consider the approximability of constraint satisfaction problems in the streaming setting. For every constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) on n variables taking values in {0,…,q−1}, we prove that improving over the trivial approximability by a factor of q requires Ω(n) space even on instances with O(n) constraints. We also identify a broad subclass of problems for which any improvement over the trivial approximability requires Ω(n) space. The key technical core is an optimal, q−(k−1)-inapproximability for the Max k-LIN-mod q problem, which is the Max CSP problem where every constraint is given by a system of k−1 linear equations mod q over k variables. Our work builds on and extends the breakthrough work of Kapralov and Krachun (Proc. STOC 2019) who showed a linear lower bound on any non-trivial approximation of the MaxCut problem in graphs. MaxCut corresponds roughly to the case of Max k-LIN-mod q with k=q=2. For general CSPs in the streaming setting, prior results only yielded Ω(√n) space bounds. In particular no linear space lower bound was known for an approximation factor less than 1/2 for any CSP. Extending the work of Kapralov and Krachun to Max k-LIN-mod q to k>2 and q>2 (while getting optimal hardness results) is the main technical contribution of this work. Each one of these extensions provides non-trivial technical challenges that we overcome in this work. 

Neuromorphic computing would benefit from the utilization of improved customized hardware. However, the translation of neuromorphic algorithms to hardware is not easily accomplished. In particular, building superconducting neuromorphic systems requires expertise in both superconducting physics and theoretical neuroscience, which makes such design particularly challenging. In this work, we aim to bridge this gap by presenting a tool and methodology to translate algorithmic parameters into circuit specifications. We first show the correspondence between theoretical neuroscience models and the dynamics of our circuit topologies. We then apply this tool to solve a linear system and implement Boolean logic gates by creating spiking neural networks with our superconducting nanowire-based hardware. 

Neuromorphic computing would benefit from the utilization of improved customized hardware. However, the translation of neuromorphic algorithms to hardware is not easily accomplished. In particular, building superconducting neuromorphic systems requires expertise in both supercon- ducting physics and theoretical neuroscience, which makes such design particularly challenging. In this work, we aim to bridge this gap by presenting a tool and methodology to translate algorith- mic parameters into circuit specifications. We first show the correspondence between theoretical neuroscience models and the dynamics of our circuit topologies. We then apply this tool to solve a linear system and implement Boolean logic gates by creating spiking neural networks with our superconducting nanowire-based hardware.